ESTABLISHING DISABILITY
STATUS IN FIBROMYALGIA AND CHRONIC FATIGUE SYNDROME

1001 W San Martin Dr.
Tucson AZ 85704
520-628-7777
Fax 520-844-1452
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
This article is largely based on the excellent work of Muhammad B. Yunus, MD,
FACP, FACR, FRCPE Section of Rheumatology University of Illinois College of
Medicine at Peoria and his article :A comprehensive medical evaluation of
patients with fibromyalgia syndrome Rheumatic Diseases Clinics of North America
Volume 28 • Number 2 • May 2002
and Nelson M. Gantz in Noble: Textbook of Primary Care Medicine, 3rd ed.,
Copyright © 2001 Mosby, Inc.
The legal discussion was excerpted from “Wilborn,s social security disability
advocate’s handbook ( James publishing)
Fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) is a common and distressful condition with multiple
multiple facets. FMS patients can be subclassified into five groups based on
their clinical presentations:
Predominant pain and fatigue;
Predominant anxiety, stress, and depression;
Predominant multiple sites of pain complaints and tender points (TP);
Predominant numbness and swollen feeling;
Associated features, that is, irritable bowel syndrome and headaches .
Fatigue is the hallmark of the chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS); fatigue must be
new, persistent, or relapsing and associated with a 50% reduction in a patient's
premorbid activity for at least 6 months. In the mid-1980s, reports erroneously
linked CFS to Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), and CFS continues to be controversial.
Fibromyalgia is a similar disorder of widespread musculoskeletal pain and
fatigue with other symptoms, such as poor sleep. CFS and fibromyalgia are
overlapping disorders; about 75% of patients with CFS also meet the criteria for
fibromyalgia, and vice versa. The onset of CFS is often acute after an
infectious illness, typically viral, whereas the onset is often gradual with
fibromyalgia.
PATHOPHYSIOLOGY
The cause of CFS and fibromyalgia is unknown. Patients with fibromyalgia report
either a gradual onset of their disorder or an "event," such as a flulike
illness or physical trauma. Patients with CFS often recall the onset after an
acute viral illness.
The cardinal symptom of CFS is fatigue. The fatigue of CFS refers to a state of
profound mental and physical exhaustion that cannot be explained by ongoing
exertion or activities. The fatigue also is disproportionately exacerbated by
activity and is not ameliorated by rest. Other characteristic symptoms of CFS
include self-perceived impairments of short-term memory and concentration, sleep
problems, muscle and joint pain headache, dizziness, allergic symptoms, and
depression
In 1990 the American College of Rheumatology outlined guidelines for diagnosing
fibromyalgia by requiring that widespread pain be present for 3 months or more.
Widespread pain refers to pain involving both sides of the body and above and
below the waist. In addition, to fulfill the diagnostic criteria, pain must be
present in 11 or more of 18 specified tender points on digital palpation (see
fig,1 ). Other symptoms and signs include sleep problems, fatigue, stiffness,
and cold intolerance.
DIAGNOSIS
The CDC case definition is currently the most accepted basis for diagnosing CFS,
A patient must have unexplained persistent fatigue for 6 months that is new and
not caused by exertion,
1. Clinically evaluated, unexplained, persistent, or relapsing fatigue for at
least 6 months that:
Is of new or definite onset,
Is not the result of ongoing exertion,
Is not substantially alleviated by rest, and Results in substantial reduction
in previous levels of activities.
Is not relieved by rest, and results in a substantial reduction in previous
levels of activity.
2. Four or more of the following concurrent symptoms on a persistent or
recurrent basis during 6 or more consecutive months of illness, none of which
may predate the fatigue:
Self-reported impairment in short-term memory or concentration that is severe
enough to cause substantial reduction in previous levels of occupational,
educational, social, or personal activities previous levels of occupational,
educational, social, or personal activities
Sore throat
Tender cervical or axillary lymph nodes
Muscle pain
Multijoint pain without joint swelling or redness
Headaches of a new type, pattern, or severity
Unrefreshing sleep
Postexertional malaise lasting more than 24 hours
The diagnosis of CFS is difficult and remains one of exclusion. No laboratory
test can confirm the diagnosis; routine laboratory tests are normal, and the
erythrocyte sedimentation rate is not elevated. Similarly, antinuclear antibody
or rheumatoid factor testing should be ordered only if the patient has joint
complaints. Selected immunologic tests may be abnormal in patients with CFS but
are indicated only for research purposes. Although symptoms of the so-called
yeast connection or Candida hypersensitivity syndrome overlap those of CFS, no
evidence indicates that the "yeast syndrome" exists, and testing for Candida
antibodies is not indicated.
Cortisol excretion is decreased in CFS patients compared with controls. This may
result from a deficiency of corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) or another
stimulus of the pituitary-adrenal axis. In contrast to patients with CFS,
cortisol secretion may be increased in patients with primary depression.
CFS has been associated with neurally mediated low blood pressure .In one study
30% to 89% of patients with CFS dropped their blood pressure when placed on a a
tilt table and responded to salt loading, fludrocortisone, beta-adrenergic
blockers, and disopyramide.
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) brain scans may show multiple foci of high
signal intensity in the white matter in patients with CFS compared with
controls. The meaning of these findings is unknown, and an MRI brain scan is not
useful as a diagnostic test.
Patients complain of multiple cognitive defects, but various neuropsychologic
tests have not been of value in documenting these abnormalities. Although
fatigue is a hallmark of CFS, no myopathy has been identified. Similarly,
patients often complain of weakness but on testing demonstrate normal muscle
strength.
Roizenblatt et al. reported that FMS patients with phasic alpha sleep reported
significantly more pain and more tender points following their disturbed sleep.
Yunus et al showed that poor sleep is significantly (P = 0.01 or less)
correlated with all important fibromyalgia features, e.g., pain, number of pain
sites, fatigue, global severity, functional status by Health Assessment
Questionnaire (HAQ), as well as anxiety, depression, and stress (as measured by
validated questionnaires). Interestingly, number of TP was not significantly
correlated
Widespread pain and multiple tender points are characteristic of fibromyalgia,
but again, no diagnostic laboratory test exists. Patients with fibromyalgia
sleep poorly, and sleep abnormalities have been identified on
electroencephalograms; however, these findings are not specific for fibromyalgia.
Neuroendocrine abnormalities, such as reduced excretion of urinary free cortisol
and decreased levels of insulin growth were reported
Many patients with FM complain of cognitive difficulties. A recent study has
shown poorer working memory, word groping, and poorer vocabulary in FMS as
compared with age matched controls. While no appropriate studies have been
published, these symptoms may be contributed by poor sleep, fatigue, psychologic
factors, and medications among clinic patients.
Associated/overlapping conditions
Originally observed by Yunus , it is now well accepted that there are many
similar conditions that overlap with FMS. The expanding list of these
conditions, which occur more frequently in FMS than control groups, include
irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), tension-type headaches, migraine,
temporomandibular dysfunction (TMD), myofascial pain syndrome, chronic fatigue
syndrome, restless legs syndrome (RLS), multiple chemical sensitivity, and
post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), among others. One third of FMS patients
have ( restless legs syndrome ) RLS . RLS is characterized by an unpleasant
sensation in the legs, feet, or sometimes in the thigh, often described as
“insects crawling,” “worms writhing,” or tingling or numbness. The fundamental
characteristic of RLS is that it occurs at rest (while in bed, prolonged
sitting) and relieved by movement, unlike the paresthesia of peripheral
neuritis, which does not have this definite pattern.
MANAGEMENT
CFS and fibromyalgia are chronic illnesses in which the course waxes and wanes.
The objectives of therapy are to educate the patient, provide symptomatic
relief, and preserve or improve functional ability. Patient support groups can
play an important role. Treatment can be divided into nonpharmacologic
approaches (e.g., physical therapy, exercise, counseling, cognitive behavior
therapy [CBT]) and pharmacologic therapy Pharmacologic therapies treat symptoms
such as depression, anxiety, sleep problems, allergies, and muscle and joint
pains. Antiviral drugs (e.g., acyclovir, corticosteroids,
immunoglobulins) have no role. Some patients have hypotension on tilt table
testing and may benefit from salt loading, fludrocortisone, or beta-adrenergic
blockers.
Since no specific therapy exists for CFS and fibromyalgia, emotional support is
critical. Patients should be followed to continue to exclude other medical
problems. In more than half of patients, symptoms persist for years.
Triggering, aggravating, and relieving
factors
Although most patients with FMS describe
an insidious onset of their symptoms, sometimes dating back in childhood, a
significant minority (25–30%) state that their fibromyalgia was triggered by a
certain event, for example, trauma, infection (mostly viral), surgery, another
medical illness , or mental stress . Most patients report that their symptoms
are aggravated by cold and humid weather, winter months, poor sleep, repetitive
or other forms of physical injury, mental stress, and physical inactivity, and
are improved by warm and dry weather, warm months, rest, moderate physical
activity, good sleep, rest, and relaxation.
Physical examination
As is the case with history taking, physical examination of a patient suspected
to have FMS from symptoms should be “fibromyalgia focused” that is, examination
for tender point elicitation with additional examination for concomitant or
associated conditions If postural hypotension is suggested by history, blood
pressure should be taken in recumbent and standing position, followed by a tilt
table test , if necessary. A drop in systolic blood pressure of >25 mm Hg, a
failure to increase heart rate, or development of syncope may be taken to be a
positive tilt test . .
The most important physical examination for a diagnosis of FMS is to
systematically palpate (with an approximate force of 4 kg) the 18 sites
suggested by the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria as shown in:
Bilateral occiput (at the suboccipital muscle insertion);
Bilateral low cervical (at the anterior aspect of the intertransverse spaces
between C5–7);
Bilateral trapezius (mid-point of the upper border);
Bilateral supraspinatus (origin of this muscle above the scapular spine near
the border);
Bilateral second rib (just lateral to the costochondral junctions on upper
surface);
Bilateral lateral epicondyle (2 cm distal to the epicondyle);
Bilateral gluteal (at the upper outer quadrant of the buttock);
Bilateral greater trochanter (posterior to the trochanteric);
Bilateral knee (medial fat pad proximal to the joint line).

Diagnosis and differential diagnosis
It needs to be emphasized that FMS is not
a disease or illness of exclusion, and should be diagnosed by its own
characteristics. American College of Rheumatology criteria have two components:
1. Widespread pain for at least three months (pain in the left side of the body,
plus right side of the body, plus pain above the waist, plus pain below the
waist, plus axial pain; axial pain includes pain in the cervical spine, or
thoracic pain, or low back, or anterior chest wall).
2. Presence of 11 TP among 18 specified sites as has been described above.
The presence of a second condition does not exclude a diagnosis of FMS .

Laboratory and radiological evaluation
The emphatic statement with regard to “lab testing” is that no particular test
is necessary to rule in or rule out fibromyalgia, which essentially should be
diagnosed by its own clinical characteristics as described above.
No special laboratory or radiologic testing is necessary for making a diagnosis
of FMS; routine testing for rheumatoid factor or antinuclear antibodies is not
recommended.
Routine complete blood count, BUN, creatinine, liver enzymes, serum calcium
Serum T4, TSH
Sleep study if clinically indicated (see text)
Blood and/or radiologic tests for concomitant conditions, if clinically
indicated by history and/or examination.
ESTABLISHING DISABILITY STATUS IN FM AND
CFS
42 U.S.C. § 423(d)4 defines “disability as “inability to engage in any
substantial gainful activity by reason of any medically determinable physical or
mental impairment which can be expected to result in death or which has lasted
or can be expected to last for a continuous period of not less than 12 months...
For purposes of this subsection, a “physical or mental impairment” is an
impairment that results from anatomical, physiological, or psychological
abnormalities which are demonstrable by medically acceptable clinical and
laboratory diagnostic techniques.
To emphasize the importance of signs and findings in the disability
determination, 42 U.S.C. § 423(d)(5)(A) provides that “[a]n individual’s
statement as to pain or other symptoms shall not alone be conclusive evidence of
disability as defined in this section; there must be medical signs and
findings,5 established by medically acceptable clinical or laboratory diagnostic
techniques, which show the existence of a medical impairment that results from
anatomical, physiological, or psychological abnormalities.”
The Social Security Administration interpretation of the statute contained in
SSR-96-4p reinforces this instruction. Although the Act and SSR 96-4p provide
that a “symptom” is not a “medically determinable physical or mental
impairment,” footnote #2 of SSR 96-4p describes the following circumstances
under which what otherwise might be considered to be a “symptom” is really a
medical “sign”:
20 CFR 404.1528, 404.1529, 416.928, and 416.929 provide that symptoms, such as
pain, fatigue, shortness of breath, weakness or nervousness, are an individual’s
own perception or description of the impact of his or her physical or mental
impairment. However, when any of these manifestations is an anatomical,
physiological, or psychological abnormality that can be shown by medically
acceptable clinical diagnostic techniques, it represents a medical “sign” rather
than a “symptom.”
SSR 96-2p completes the proof with the following definition of the statutory
term of art, “medically acceptable”:
Medically acceptable. This term means that the clinical and laboratory
diagnostic techniques that the medical source uses are in accordance with the
medical standards that are generally accepted within the medical community as
the appropriate techniques to establish the existence and severity of an
impairment.
The medical standards that are generally accepted within the medical community
as the appropriate techniques for establishing the existence and severity of
fibromyalgia and chronic fatigue syndrome are detailed in various medical
publications. See, for example, Wolfe, F. et. al.: The American College Of
Rheumatology 1990 Criteria For The Classification Of Fibromyalgia: Report Of The
Multicenter Criteria Committee. Arthritis & Rheumatology (1990) 33:160-72. See
also the December 1994 revised working case definition of CFS established by the
Centers for Disease Control: Fukuda, et.al. “The Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: A
Comprehensive Approach to its Definition and Study,” Annals of Internal
Medicine, (1994) 121:953-59.
In a claim involving allegations of disability based in whole or in part on FM
or CFS, it is the responsibility of the claimant’s representative to ensure that
the claimant’s treating and/or examining physicians are aware of, and employ,
the techniques for establishing the existence and severity of fibromyalgia and
chronic fatigue syndrome as set out in the above-referenced medical articles and
SSR 99-2p.
NINTH CIRCUIT PRECEDENTS
The Ninth circuit is the highest federal Court in the western states and its
holdings control federal court decisions in Arizona. In Day v. Weinberger, 522
F.2d 1154 (9th Cir. 1975), the Ninth Circuit addressed the fact that disability
may be proved by medically-acceptable clinical techniques.
, “in concluding that Day was not disabled, as “disability” is defined in 42
U.S.C. § 423(d), the Hearing Examiner relied on three other factors. First, he
noted that none of Day’s medical experts had been able, through the use of
objective diagnostic techniques, to identify specific cause for Day’s alleged
pain. Second, the examiner noted that during Day’s appearance at the hearing,
she did not exhibit the physical manifestations of prolonged pain that are
listed in a leading medical textbook. Finally, the examiner relied on his own
observations of Day at the hearing and certain of Day’s own testimony in
concluding that she remained capable of doing light work.
The first two factors upon which the examiner relied provide little, if any,
support for his ultimate conclusion. Disability may be proved by
medically-acceptable clinical diagnoses, as well as by objective laboratory
findings. 42 U.S.C. § 423(d)(3); see Stark v. Weinberger, 497 F.2d 1092, 1097
(7th Cir., 1974); Flake v. Gardner, 399 F.2d 532, 540-41 (9th Cir., 1968). And
the Hearing Examiner, who was not qualified as a medical expert, should not have
gone outside the record to medical textbooks for the purpose of making his own
exploration and assessment as to claimant’s physical condition. Williams v.
Richardson, 458 F.2d 991, 992 (5th Cir. 1972).”
For three cases within the Ninth Circuit addressing FM and CFS see Reddick v.
Chater, 157 F.3d 715 (9th Cir. 1998); Bunnell v. Sullivan, 947 F.2d 341 (9th
Cir. 1991); and Irwin v. Shalala, 840 F.Supp. 751 (D.Or. 1993).
In May 11 1998 Deputy Commissioner for Disability and Income Security Programs,
Susan Daniels, wrote a memoranda to an ALJ who argued that the symptoms of FM
should not be considered medically acceptable clinical and laboratory diagnostic
techniques in support of the claimant’s application for disability
determination:
“Your letter states that fibromyalgia and CFS do not constitute medically
determinable impairments within the meaning of section 223(d)(3) of the Social
Security Act because there are no acceptable medical criteria by which these
impairments can be diagnosed…. However, SSA has taken a definitive position that
fibromyalgia and CFS can constitute medically determinable impairments within
the meaning of the statute. As you noted in your letter, CFS was discussed in
the process unification training in 1996-1997...This position is consistent with
the instructions in Program Operations Manual System (POMS) DI 24515.075,
Disability Digest No. 93-5, and Social Security Rulings (SSRs) 96-3p, 96-4p, and
96-7p, issued on July 2, 1996, which detail our policies as to how symptoms
affect determinations of the presence of a medically determinable impairment,
impairment severity, and the ability to engage in sustained work activity.
Establishing the existence of a medically determinable impairment does not
necessarily require that the claimant or the medical evidence establish a
specific diagnosis. This is especially true when the medical community has not
reached agreement on a single set of diagnostic criteria. ..Your argument based
on the Rulings seems to misinterpret the explanation in Footnote 2 to SSR 96-4p,
which explains our longstanding policy, consistent with 20 CFR §§ 404.1528(b)
and 416.928(b), that some symptoms, when appropriately reported by a physician
or psychologist in a clinical setting, can also be considered “signs” because
sometimes these observations constitute “medically acceptable clinical
diagnostic techniques.” This is true for mental impairments in general and for
such widely recognizable disorders as migraine headaches”
CONCLUSION
FM and CFS are “real diseases" which lead to disability. The key to winning in
front an ALJ is to have the physician meticulously follow the guidelines
established by the American College Of Rheumatology 1990 Criteria For The
Classification Of Fibromyalgia: Report Of The Multicenter Criteria Committee.
Arthritis & Rheumatology (1990) 33:160-72. Thorough notes and commitment of the
treating physician to assist the claimant in her quest for disability
determination are of paramount importance.